have any personal knowledge of him to whom they entrust their liberty and fortune.

Yet, this representation has the whole effect expected or desired; that of spreading so wide the care of general interest, and the participation of publick counsels, that the interest or corruption of particular men can seldom operate with much injury to the publick.

For this reason, many populous and opulent Towns, neither enjoy nor desire particular Representatives; they are included in the general scheme of publick administration, and cannot suffer but with the rest of the Empire.

It is urged that the Americans have not the same security, and that a British legislator may wanton with their property; yet, if it be true, that their wealth is our wealth, and that their ruin will be our ruin, the Parliament has the same interest in attending to them, as to any other part of the Nation. The reason why we place any confidence in our Representatives is, that they must share in the good or evil which their counsels shall produce. Their share is indeed commonly consequential and remote; but it is not often possible that any immediate advantage can be extended to such numbers as may prevail against it. We are therefore as secure against intentional deprivations of Government as human wisdom can make us, and upon this security the Americans may venture to repose.

It is said by the Old Member who has written an appeal against the tax, that the produce of American labour is spent in British manufactures, the balance of trade is greatly against them; whatever you take directly in taxes, is in effect taken from your own commerce. If the Minister seizes the money with which the American should pay his debts and come to market, the Merchant cannot expect him. as a customer, nor can the debts already contracted be paid. Suppose we obtain from America a million, instead of one hundred thousand Pounds; it would be supplying one personal exigence by the future ruin of our commerce.

All this is true; but the Old Member seems not to perceive, that if his brethren of the Legislature know this as well as himself, the Americans are in no danger of oppression, since by men commonly provident, they must be so taxed, as that we may not lose one way what we gain another.

The same Old Member has discovered, that the Judges formerly thought it illegal to tax Ireland, and declares that no cases can be more alike than those of Ireland and America; yet the Judges whom he quotes have mentioned a difference. Ireland, they say, hath a Parliament of its own. When any Colony has an independent Parliament, acknowledged by the Parliament of Britain, the cases will differ less. Yet by the sixth George the First, chapter fifth, the Acts of the British Parliament bind Ireland.

It is urged that when Wales, Durham, and Chester, were divested of their particular privileges or ancient Government, and reduced to the state of English Counties, they had Representatives assigned them.

To those from whom something had been taken, some thing in return might properly be given. To the Americans, their Charters are left as they were, except that of which their sedition has deprived them. If they were to be represented in Parliament, something would be granted, though nothing is withdrawn.

The inhabitants of Chester, Durham, and Wales, were invited to exchange their peculiar institutions for the power of voting, which they wanted before. The Americans have voluntarily resigned the power of voting to live in distant and separate Governments, and what they have voluntarily quitted they have no right to claim.

It must always be remembered that they are represented by the same virtual representation as the greater part of Englishmen, and that if, by change of place, they have less share in the Legislature than is proportioned to their opulence, they, by their removal, gained that opulence, and had originally, and have now their choice of a vote at home, or riches at a distance.

We are told, what appears to the Old Member and to others a position that must drive us into inextricable absurdity, that we have either no right, or the sole right of taxing the Colonies. The meaning is, that if we can tax them they cannot tax themselves; and that if they can tax themselves, we cannot tax them. We answer with very little hesitation, that for the general use of the Empire, we have the sole right of taxing them. If they have contributed anything in their own Assemblies, what they contributed was not paid, but given; it was not a tax or tribute, but a present; yet they have the natural and legal power of levying money on themselves for Provincial purposes; of providing for their own expense, at their own discretion. Let not this be thought new or strange; it is the state of every Parish in the Kingdom.

The friends of the Americans are of different opinions. Some think that being unrepresented they ought to tax themselves, and others, that they ought to have Representatives in the British Parliament.

If they are to tax themselves what power is to remain in the Supreme Legislature? That they must settle their own mode of levying their money, is supposed. May the British Parliament tell them how much they shall contribute? If the sum may be prescribed, they will return few thanks for the power of raising it; if they are at liberty to grant or to deny, they are no longer subjects.

If they are to be represented, what number of these Western orators are to be admitted? This, I suppose, the Parliament must settle; yet, if men have a natural and unalienable right to be represented, who shall determine the number of their Delegates? Let us, however, suppose them to send twenty-three, half as many as the Kingdom of Scotland, what will this representation avail them? To pay taxes will be still a grievance. The love of money will not be lessened, nor the power of getting it increased.

Whither will this necessity of representation drive us? Is every petty settlement to be out of the reach of Government, till it has sent a Senator to Parliament; or may two or a greater number be forced to unite in a single deputation? What at last is the difference between him that is taxed by compulsion without representation, and him that is represented by compulsion in order to be taxed?

For many reigns the House of Commons was in a state of fluctuation; new Burgesses were added from time to time, without any reason now to be discovered; but the number has been fixed for more than a century and a half, and the King's power of increasing it has been questioned. It will hardly be thought fit to new-model the Constitution in favour of the Planters, who, as they grow rich, may buy estates in England, and without any innovation effectually represent their native Colonies.

The friends of the Americans, indeed, ask for them what they do not ask for themselves. This inestimable right of representation, they have never solicited. They mean not to exchange solid money for such airy honour. They say, and say willingly, that they cannot conveniently be represented, because their inference is, that they cannot be taxed. They are too remote to share the general government, and therefore claim the privilege of governing themselves.

Of the principles contained in the Resolutions of the Congress, however wild, indefinite, and obscure, such has been the influence upon American understanding, that from New England to South Carolina there is formed a general combination of all the Provinces against their mother country. The madness of independence has spread from Colony to Colony, till order is lost and Government despised, and all is filled with misrule, uproar, violence, and confusion. To be quiet is disaffection; to be loyal is treason.

The Congress of Philadelphia, an assembly convened by its own authority, has promulgated a Declaration, in compliance with which the communication between Britain and the greatest part of North America is now suspended. They ceased to admit the importation of English Goods, in December, 1774, and determined to permit the exportation of their own no longer than to November, 1775.

This might seem enough; but they have done more. They have declared that they shall treat all as enemies who do not concur with them in disaffection and perverseness, and that they will trade with none that shall trade with Britain.

They threaten to stigmatize in their Gazette those who shall consume the products or merchandise of their mother country, and are now searching suspected houses for prohibited goods.

These hostile declarations they profess themselves ready to maintain by force. They, have armed the Militia of